What is the core idea behind the Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)?
Clients should not be forced to depend on methods they don't use.
Code should be open for extension but closed for modification.
Subclasses should be substitutable for their base classes.
Classes should have only one responsibility.
Which of these is a benefit of adhering to the Single Responsibility Principle?
Increased class size for better code organization.
Reduced code duplication and improved reusability.
Tighter coupling between classes for better collaboration.
More complex class design for handling multiple tasks.
The Liskov Substitution Principle primarily deals with the relationship between:
All of the above
Subclasses and their superclasses
Interfaces and their implementations
Classes and their instances
Which of these is NOT a benefit commonly associated with applying the Dependency Inversion Principle?
Improved testability
Increased code complexity
Enhanced code reusability
Reduced code coupling
Which of the following best describes the Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)?
Low-level modules should depend on high-level modules.
Both high-level and low-level modules should depend on abstractions.
Abstractions should depend on concrete implementations.
High-level modules should depend on low-level modules.
In a layered application, which layer typically contains the high-level modules according to DIP?
Business Logic Layer
Database Layer
Presentation Layer
Data Access Layer
In the context of DIP, what are abstractions typically represented by?
Concrete classes
User interface components
Database connections
Interfaces or abstract classes
How do SOLID principles contribute to reducing code complexity?
By promoting modular and decoupled code
By promoting shorter code
By enforcing strict coding standards
By encouraging the use of design patterns
How does the Interface Segregation Principle contribute to loose coupling in software design?
By encouraging the use of global variables for communication between classes.
By minimizing dependencies between classes to only what is absolutely necessary.
By reducing the need for unit testing.
By promoting the use of concrete classes instead of interfaces.
Which of these is NOT a potential consequence of violating the Liskov Substitution Principle?
Higher likelihood of introducing bugs when extending or modifying code.
Improved performance due to optimized subclass implementations.
Decreased code reusability as subclasses may not behave as expected.
Increased code complexity and reduced readability.